Loading... Please wait...
Categories
- Acceptance & Admission
- Arts & Entertainment
- Book Reports and Reviews
- Business & Economics
- Communication & Mass Media
- Education
- English Composition
- History & Politics
- Information Technology
- Labor Studies
- Law & Criminology
- Leadership
- Life Sciences
- Literature & Language
- Medicine & Health
- Nature
- Religion and Theology
- Research Methods
- Science & Engineering
- Social Sciences
- Tourism & Hospitality
New E-content
- Home
- Business Ethics
- Do pharmaceutical companies have a responsibility to society in general and to those who are HIV-Positive in particular that extends beyond the interests of their shareholders? Spar, D. & Bartlett, N. (2005). Life, death and property rights: The p
Do pharmaceutical companies have a responsibility to society in general and to those who are HIV-Positive in particular that extends beyond the interests of their shareholders? Spar, D. & Bartlett, N. (2005). Life, death and property rights: The p
Price:
$3.99
Product Description
Warranty Information
Title: Pharmaceutical Companies, Profits, and Human Life
Contents
1. Introduces the case
2. Do pharmaceutical companies have a responsibility to society in general and to those who are HIV-Positive in particular that extends beyond the interests of their shareholders?
3. With respect to the case presented by Spar and Bartlett: What solutions to the AIDS crisis would you argue for as a representative of Doctors Without Borders? The South African Health Ministry? A Brazilian pharmaceutical company? The UN WHO? Pfizer?
4. Is it reasonable to expect that more ethical behaviour by business – as urged for example, by proponents of a ‘triple bottom line’ approach to business – can address social problems like AIDS effectively? Why or why not?
5. References
Word count (without references): 498 (1.66 pages)
The case is indicated below:
Spar, D. & Bartlett, N. (2005). Life, death and property rights: The pharmaceutical industry faces AIDS in Africa. Harvard Business School, 9 (702-049).
Contents
1. Introduces the case
2. Do pharmaceutical companies have a responsibility to society in general and to those who are HIV-Positive in particular that extends beyond the interests of their shareholders?
3. With respect to the case presented by Spar and Bartlett: What solutions to the AIDS crisis would you argue for as a representative of Doctors Without Borders? The South African Health Ministry? A Brazilian pharmaceutical company? The UN WHO? Pfizer?
4. Is it reasonable to expect that more ethical behaviour by business – as urged for example, by proponents of a ‘triple bottom line’ approach to business – can address social problems like AIDS effectively? Why or why not?
5. References
Word count (without references): 498 (1.66 pages)
The case is indicated below:
Spar, D. & Bartlett, N. (2005). Life, death and property rights: The pharmaceutical industry faces AIDS in Africa. Harvard Business School, 9 (702-049).